June 25, 2018
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
As the Senate considers the Fiscal Year 2019Appropriations for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, support for
environmental stewardship and its moral and human dimensions should be given
priority. Adequate funding for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
Department of Interior (DOI) is essential since all people depend on the
environment for their livelihood, health, recreation and survival.
In March, Congress passed a budget package for FY 2018
that maintained or increased funding for many EPA and DOI programs that protect
natural resources and safeguard public and environmental health. With the
appropriations process for the next fiscal year well underway, it is time once
again to uphold these values and oppose unnecessary and harmful cuts to
environmental stewardship. President Trump's budget plan for fiscal year 2019
calls for an unacceptable $4.1 billion cut to stewardship programs of the EPA
and the DOI.
The House and Senate bills that have advanced out of committee improve upon the President's request in a few important ways.
Overall, funding for DOI programs remains steady at 2018 levels, and both bills
include commendable increases to the National Park Service. The House also
proposes an increase in funding for Superfund cleanup, an essential component
of the EPA's mandate to maintain clean air, water, and soil. Funding for EPA's
geographic programs are also maintained. Yet, the House bill also includes some
disappointing cuts, including $100 million to EPA funding overall, as well as a
$65 million decrease in funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund. The
Senate bill that passed out of committee rejects harmful cuts to the EPA while
focusing funding on strong environmental stewardship.
In your deliberations, you are urged to maintain, or
if possible, increase funding to the EPA and DOI, as these agencies oversee
crucial programs that protect our nation's natural resources. Funding for the
Land and Water Conservation Fund should continue to be maintained, as it is key
to good environmental stewardship. You are also urged to adopt the funding
increases as reflected in the House bill mentioned above.
As pressures on environmental resources continue to
grow, it must be remembered that "only when 'the economic and social costs
of using up shared environmental resources are recognized with transparency and
fully borne by those who incur them, not by other peoples or future generations,'
can those actions be considered ethical" (Laudato Si' no. 195). The federal budget is a moral document, and
the funding of programs that care for creation and serve vulnerable people and
communities carries with it ethical implications. Continuing on the path of
creation stewardship is essential.
Most Rev. Frank J. Dewane
Bishop of Venice
Chairman, Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development