Print | Share | Calendar | Diocesan Locator
|   No Spanish version at this time
FOLLOW US  Click to go to Facebook.  Click to go to Twitter.  Click to go to YouTube.   TEXT SIZE Click to make text small. Click for medium-sized text. Click to make text large.  

Take Action!

Religious Liberty Action Alerts

Protect the Rights of Pro-Life Health Care Providers! E-mail your congressional representatives! To learn more, read our two-page fact sheet.

Subscribe to future action alerts today!

Find Out More

Who We Are

Find the Latest News on our homepage

Learn more, Religious Liberty at Home 

Learn more, International Religious Freedom

Watch current Videos on Religious Liberty

Pray for Religious Liberty at home and abroad

View our Fortnight Image Gallery

Subscribe to the monthly e-newsletter, Free to Serve


Reply STOP to quit service
Message & Data Rates May Apply


Daily Message

"There is not a shadow of right on the general government to intermeddle with religion. Its least interference with it would be a most flagrant usurpation. I can appeal to my uniform conduct on this subject that I have warmly supported religious freedom."

–James Madison

Call to Prayer for Life,
Marriage & Religious Liberty


Call to Prayer English logo-montage
Join the Call to Prayer for Life, Marriage & Religious Liberty (en español) and receive a new prayer intention each week by email, text message or Facebook.

Mother's Day Montage Ad Special Ad for NABRE Bibles Sacrament Series Ad

Religious Freedom and Marriage


Redefining Marriage and the Threat to Religious Liberty

The Catholic Church teaches: "Marriage and the family are institutions that must be promoted and defended from every possible misrepresentation of their true nature, since whatever is injurious to them is injurious to society itself" (Sacramentum Caritatis, 29). The following examples illustrate that efforts to redefine marriage are harming the religious freedom of believers in the true definition of marriage.

Idaho – In 2014, two Protestant ministers (a husband and a wife) who operate a wedding chapel in Coeur d'Alene said they would not officiate at a same-sex "wedding." City officials informed the ministers that their refusal to officiate violated the city's ordinance outlawing discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of "sexual orientation." The city eventually declined to prosecute the ministers.

New Mexico  – The owners of a photography studio would not take the pictures of a same-sex "commitment ceremony" because they did  not want to participate in behavior contrary to their religious beliefs. In 2013, the New Mexico Supreme Court denied the owners' appeal, affirming the lower court opinion that the studio violated the state Human Rights Act. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case. 

Washington – A florist who declined to provide flowers for a same-sex "wedding" was sued by the state Attorney General. In February 2015, a state judge ruled against the florist and found that she "cannot comply with both the law and her faith if she continues to provide flowers for weddings as part of her duly-licensed business, Arlene's Flowers."

Colorado – Two men "married" in Massachusetts requested a Denver bakery make a "wedding" cake for their wedding reception in Denver. For religious reasons, the owners of the bakery declined to make the cake. The two men filed a complaint with the Colorado Division of Civil Rights, which found that the bakery violated the law. Then the Attorney General's office filed a complaint against the bakery, resulting in further court rulings against the bakery.

Vermont – For allegedly not hosting a "wedding" reception for a same-sex "couple," Catholic owners of a bed and breakfast settled a discrimination lawsuit, requiring them to (1) pay a $10,000 civil penalty, (2) pay $20,000 to a charitable trust, and (3) not host wedding receptions of any kind. Upon settling the lawsuit, the owners of the bed and breakfast said, "But no one can force us to abandon our deeply held beliefs about marriage."

New Jersey – The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights found that a Methodist organization violated a public accommodations law by not allowing a same-sex civil union ceremony at its boardwalk pavilion.

Catholic Charities – Catholic Charities of Boston (2006), Catholic Charities San Francisco (2006), Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., (2010), and Catholic Charities affiliates in Illinois (2011) had to cease adoption services or face civil liability for not placing children in the homes of same-sex couples.

Legislation called the Marriage and Religious Freedom Act has recently been introduced in the U.S. Congress to try to remedy some of these problems and ensure that people can live out their beliefs on marriage.

Return to Religious Freedom at Home

By accepting this message, you will be leaving the website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. This link is provided solely for the user's convenience. By providing this link, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops assumes no responsibility for, nor does it necessarily endorse, the website, its content, or sponsoring organizations.

cancel  continue