FOLLOW US  Click to go to Facebook.  Click to go to Twitter.  Click to go to YouTube.   TEXT SIZE Click to make text small. Click for medium-sized text. Click to make text large.  

Dark Times, Sleeping Giants, Women in Peril: Favorite Tales from Abortion Mythology


One informal measure of pro-life success is the level of hysteria and hyperbole in the abortion lobby's fundraising letters. A recent plea from NARAL Pro-Choice America ("NARAL") begins: "It's a dark time for women's rights." NARAL explains the need for emergency contributions to fight the proposed ban on partial-birth abortion — called the "latest blow in Bush's war on women" — and to "awaken the sleeping giant that is pro-choice America."

Sleeping giant? If "pro-choice America" means people who support the current law — any abortion method, at any time, for any reason — it represents barely 23% of the public (Gallup analysis, June 2003). An additional 15% of the public would place greater restrictions on abortions, while keeping most legal.

Gallup's study of abortion attitudes reveals that a large and steadily growing majority of Americans are opposed to virtually all the abortions permitted under Roe v. Wade. Almost 1 in 5 Americans want abortion illegal in all circumstances (19%), and another 42% would forbid abortion except in the narrowest circumstances — typically where the mother's life is endangered or in cases of rape or incest, amounting to less than 3% of abortions each year. Taken together, 61% of the public opposes all but a small fraction of the abortions that are done today. By a margin of 61 to 38, Americans — if they had the political power to do so — would outlaw over 97% of abortions. Regrettably, the Court in Roe took that power from the states and from the American people, substituting the personal policy wishes of a few judges for the laws enacted by 50 state legislatures.

Why then are we constantly told that "most Americans are pro-choice"?

There are two main reasons: first, the common pro-choice/pro-life dichotomy is a very flawed barometer of opinion on the legality of abortion; and second, polling questions are often skewed, intentionally or not, to elicit a greater "pro-choice" response.

Polls rarely, if ever, define the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life." They allow respondents to identify themselves as belonging to one or the other category. People who are opposed to almost all abortions, but who would allow a woman to abort in the case of endangerment to her life or rape, for example, may call themselves "pro-choice" because they would allow some abortion. Also, the hostility of the mainstream press and abortion advocates to the pro-life movement, and the violent tactics of a handful of abortion opponents, have stigmatized the pro-life movement in the eyes of many people. Therefore, many who would like to see an end to abortion nevertheless shy away from the pro-life label.

There is solid evidence of support for greater restrictions on abortion among those who call themselves "pro-choice". Gallup's 2002 "In-Depth Review" of public opinion about abortion tested opinions on the legality of abortion among those who identified themselves as pro-choice or pro-life. Note that since 1998, Americans have selected between the two labels at almost equal rates. In August 2001, 46% chose each position, but the pro-choice label was slightly favored before and since. Within each camp, however, there are huge differences on the issue of legality.

Views on legality among those who say they're "pro-life" (2002) Never legal - 31%

Legal in only a few cases - 59%

Legal in most cases - 5%

Legal in all cases - 4%

Views on legality among those who say they're "pro-choice" (2002)

Never legal - 3%

Legal in only a few cases - 27%

Legal in most cases - 19%

Legal in all cases - 50%

So 30% of self-identified "pro-choice" people would ban all or almost all abortions; only 9% of self-identified "pro-life" people would oddly permit abortion in most or all cases. The latest Gallup poll (May 2003) shows 48% of Americans identifying themselves as pro-choice and 45% as pro-life. Let's readjust the columns to reflect their attitudes on the legality of abortion.

If the 30% of "pro-choice" respondents who oppose all/almost all abortions are shifted to the pro-life side (.30 x 48% =14% of total respondents), and the 9% of pro-lifers who favor keeping all/almost all abortions legal are shifted to the pro-choice column (.09 x 45% = 4% of total respondents), a truer picture emerges:

Pro-life 45% (-4% + 14%) = 55%

Pro-choice 48% (-14% + 4%) = 38%.

That's a 17-point pro-life advantage in 2002 in favor of making almost all abortions illegal.


By accepting this message, you will be leaving the website of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. This link is provided solely for the user's convenience. By providing this link, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops assumes no responsibility for, nor does it necessarily endorse, the website, its content, or sponsoring organizations.

cancel  continue